
Full
points, this is nicely organized and written…your APA
formatting is very good…your reflection pieces are wonderful
and you link them to what your reading/studying.
I have made comments throughout your review of the
literature.
You
went into great depth…is well written! Dr. I
Make
It or Break It
Jessica
L. Montgomery
City
University
Abstract
Marriage can be the most magical experience between
two people. Nice introduction….However, it can also be the
most horrific union two people can share. Also good, catches
the readers attention.
What makes or breaks a relationship?
Are there patterns that predict weather a couple will
succeed or not? If a relationship is in turmoil is there any
way to turn the situation around and keep the union
together? These are the things that we will discover as we
examine the work of psychology’s legend Dr. John Gottman I
love his work by the way!
who in his 30 years of research has interviewed
videotaped, surveyed, examined, and followed everyday people
engaging in marital relations and can successfully predict,
with more than a 95% accuracy rate, which marriages will
work and which will fail (Gottman, 1999, 7). You
don’t need a p in the citation.
Make It Or Break It
According
to John Gottman PH.D., no marriage is without conflict and the
success of a marriage depends on the couple’s process of
communication. Great information….Just because married
couples get angry often and engage in arguments does not mean
that their marriage is distant end in divorce. Well written
here…Matter a fact many solid marriages under go multiple
conflicts. The key aspect to their success is the patterns
they use in their every day lives. For instance, the
“masters” of marriage know the best and worst aspects of
each other. They know their partner's needs, ambitions, and
language (not just verbal but body language). They have
learned to communicate effectively, and can talk about things
without attacking or down playing their partner. They are
willing to unite to solve the issues at hand and accept
personal responsibility for their role in the problem. They
are capable of doing this because they spend time together,
and provide five times more positive attention than negative
attention. This in it’s self provides a type of pillow that
softens the emotional blow during a later conflict. This is
what keeps things from becoming disastrous. “Disastrous”,
kind of sounds like “disasters” and that’s how Gottman
describes the marriages that are distant to fail. These
couples tend to engage in the four horseman activities and
have a better chance of separation. So, what are the
"Four Horsemen"? I
love how you introduce this to the readers…so good.
|
The Four Horseman
|
|
Criticism
(Gottman,
1994, p74):
|
Attacking ones
partner on a personal level instead of the issue.
|
|
Defensiveness
(Gottman,
1994, p 84):
|
Attempting to
justify ones self by either denying responsibility or
counter attacking.
|
|
Contempt
(Gottman,
1994, p 74):
|
One party
begins name calling, casting personal insults, or
engaging in facial expressions such as the rolling of
the eyes.
|
|
Stonewalling
(Gottman,
1994, p 93):
|
Directly or
indirectly ignoring the person who is speaking, or
simply by walking out of the area completely.
|
These
actions cause distress which in return causes physiological
flooding. The signs of flooding are visible through, a rise in
the individual’s blood pressure, rapid heartbeat, increased
breathing patterns, the inability to sit still, changes in
facial expressions, and the inability to process information
correctly. Wow! Everyone has experienced that! Of course, when
information isn’t processed correctly, then the relationship
suffers and if a relationship is suffering because of the
"Four Horseman", then a couple has a choice. They
can throw in the towel like so many do, or they can chose to
work through the issues and attempt to save the marriage. The
key word here is work. The fact is if you don't know it by
now, all successful marriages require the hard work of both
parties. Over the years Gottman developed a plan that when
used will create a sound marital house even if the marriage is
on the brink of destruction. This
is very well written and described….
The
first step is for the couple to create a "Love Map."
(Gottman, 1999, 47) Basically a love map is a series of
questions that allow the couple to see how well they actually
know their partner. First, the partner's separate and each of
them fill out a questioner. The questioner asks specific
details about their partner. Details like, what is your
partner’s favorite author, friend, color, holiday, hobby, or
tree. It seeks answers to questions like, what are your
partner's ambitions, goals and mentors. These are questions
that help partners connect on a very personal level. After the
couple fills out the questioner, they come together and share
their answers. Many times the information may be wrong. This
is ok. It requires the couple to update the information and
note any changes. This is a positive way of communicating and
should not be taken personally. I
agree on this concept…good information.
The
second step to bridging mending a broken relationship is to
take steps to build fondness and admiration. (Gottman, 1999,
61) Great sentence and good opening to this paragraph.
The couple begins
to acknowledge the good qualities about their spouse. They
find ways to use sentences that begin with "I appreciate
it when", and “I like it when”. They learn to issue
compliments to their partner to show how much they care. Dr.
Gottman even provides a checklist of adjectives that can be
used to describe the individual should they get stuck on their
choice of words. Compliments and appreciation statements can
earn some extra points and are needed to get through the
controversial times.
The
third step to bridging the gap of conflict is to commit to
certain activities that can strengthen the relationship. (Gottman,
1999, 79) These types of activity will allow a couple to turn
towards each, other rather than turn away. Activities can
include an extravagant event such as a cruise, or something as
simple as a video and candle light dinner at home. The action
doesn't necessarily take money to accomplish. A simple walk, a
kiss, or acknowledgement can have extreme meaning. Great job!
The primary idea is to find ways to connect, and spend quality
time together. Turning towards your partner shows mindfulness
and awareness of your partner's needs. Turning towards doesn't
come easy so prepare to stumble around in the dark until you
learn what works and what don’t.
The
fourth step is verbal communication. (Gottman, 1999, 99) This
allows both parties in the relationship to take each others
opinions, and points of view into consideration. The couple
should be able discuss outside and positive issues along with
the negative ones. They may begin by spending as little as
twenty min. a day taking part in a stress reducing
conversation. Good information here…This allows the couple
to practice verbal, as well as, listening skills that are
helpful when problem or conflict conversations come into play.
Always remember, a good listener does not interrupt the
speaker, or impose their own opinion. They do however express
statements that comfort the speaker and allow them to feel
acknowledged. Being acknowledged happens to be a huge factor
especially since there will always be some issues that are
solvable and some that are gridlock.
The
best was to understand the difference between solvable and
gridlock problems is to note that solvable problems create
pain but can be worked on until a solution is found (Gottman,
1999, p 133). Gridlock problems involve such intense pain that
they generally have little to no chance of becoming solved. (Gottman,
1999, 132). Most cases of conversation that remain in gridlock
include sexual preferences, child rearing strategies, family
relationships, religion, and home maintenance. However there
is a chance that these issues can be worked through. The first
thing that a couple needs to do is understand that gridlock
problems usually have an underlining meaning that stems
farther back than the current issue. Take for example a couple
that cannot agree on the condition of their home. One partner
may be obsessive about keeping the home in perfect condition,
where as, the other partner may wish to maintain a less than
orderly atmosphere. This can create some fairly complicated
arguments that end in resentments. Each time the couple
discusses the matter it-may end in gridlock. This matter can
be approached in a better way. One partner can choose to ask
the other why it means so much to them. They can seek out the
partner's feelings, and possibly find the hidden agenda. Maybe
one of the partners grew up in an organized home and there
fore grew accustom totaling pride in their home. Or maybe it
was just the opposite. Maybe, the partner grew up in an
organized home, where so much time was spent taking care of
the home that emotional needs were left unmet, therefore, they
prefer a more relaxed atmosphere. Once the underlining reasons
are established, the couple can begin to understand what they
each want to change, and what they each need. By finding the
symbolic meaning of the issue they can begin to compromise.
No
matter the situation, couples should attempt to understand and
respect each others point of view. They should stray from any
action or statement that screams, "I'm right; you're
wrong!" This is commonly known as the attribution error.
The attribution error is built on ethnocentrism and causes the
individual to judge the other based on his or her own beliefs
and values. Despite popular belief most people face conflict
in this manner and this causes physiological changes to occur.
I like all the concepts here, respect, listening,
facing conflicts…you have such good information. This
is a sign that the party is in emotional and physical
distress.
Since
most people are ethnocentric at times and have physiological
changes during conflict its best, prior to any stressful
discussion, that a couple prearranges a hand signal that will
alert each other to distress. Each person should agree to
watch for signs that together may be in distress and be
willing to ask if a break is necessary. They should also agree
that if distress takes hold that they will take, no less than,
a twenty minuet break and agree upon a specified time to
reconvene. During this break they can -go for a walk, carry
out household chores, or use relaxation techniques. Good
techniques…Above anything else they should not use this time
to rationalize the situation. This time should be spent doing
self-soothing exercises such as deep breathing, relaxing
muscles and anything else that will assist the individual at
regaining control. Please note that males take longer than
females to recover and abuse victims of both genders may
require extra time as well.
Since
arguments happen even in the best of relationships, it's
important for the couple to process the argument. This
doesn't happen immediately following an argument. It can take
hours before a couple will be ready for such a conversation.
We call this conversation "The Aftermath". Basically
this is a time for the couple to engage in a "recovery
conversation." They should talk about the issues without
rehashing the actual argument. They should move from the
attack/defend mode to a collaborative mode. Basically this
means discussing how they felt during the argument, and
discussing the other party’s side in a clam manner. This
conversation will include admitting to your role in the
argument, and what you could do differently the next time you
discuss the issue. This can be a lot easier if the couple
utilizes Dr. Gottman's questionnaire called "The
Aftermath of a Fight Questionnaire."
Conclusion
You
have given me such good information, your review of these sources
was good and concise, very easy for the reader to understand.
Over
all, through out the relationship, it is vital for a couple to
create shared moments. They should attempt to commit to the
simplest tasks and provide support to their mate. These small
tokens provide ones partner with a sense of appreciation,
admiration and affection. By performing self-checks and updating
one’s copy of their “love mapI like this concept…they will
also be building a stronger since of belonging which allows the
couple to continue to renew their relationship. This of course
will also assist both parties in acknowledging the physiological
changes that occur and creating a new distress plan as needed.
They should always be able to explain what it is that is
upsetting them in a clear direct manner (Gottman, 1999, p 164)
and while discussing the issue they should also willingly
provide appreciation for any previous attempts. Remember
appreciation opens ears. (Gottman, 1999, 165) so don’t store
things up till they explode and always treat your partner like a
guest with politeness and control. (Gottman, 199, p 165). Most
people would accept influence from a guest so if a person
attempts to understand their partner's side this way it would be
a lot more pleasant. Basically, compromise where you can and
allow for distress, de-escalation and repair. If a solution is
established and forgiveness is allowed the situation should not
be rehashed in the future, and be willing to accept the issues
that you cannot change. Now go ahead… Put these steps together
and watch any relationship bloom. I agree! Better communication
isn’t just a dream; it can become a reality. All you have to
do is have to willing individuals and the dedication towards
success. Nice
summary of your review of the literature….
References
good choices…
Gottman, John. (1994). Why Marriages
Succeed Or Fail. New York, New York:
Simon &
Schuster Inc.
Gottman, John,
& Silver, Nan. (1999). The Seven Principles For making
marriage Work.
New
York, New York: Crown Publishers Inc.
|